Women vs. History

I love the way Beauvoir articulates the relationship between women and history: “it is not women’s inferiority that has determined their historical insignificance; it is their historical insignificance that has doomed them to inferiority” (Beauvoir 151). I think examining the role of this collective male-written and male-dominated history is really crucial to understanding not only the peculiar subjectivity of historical narratives and “truths” but also how the past continues extending into the present. A concrete tradition of male glory and power, despite the strides made in terms of gender equality, seems like it’s going to win out every time over women’s vaguer and less tangible role in history, especially when the notion of gender equality is more conceptualized than it is fulfilled or realized. Because of the extent of this history, will this cycle ever be broken?

One Reply to “Women vs. History”

  1. I think that it is possible for this cycle to be broken, though it won’t just break on its own. We should not forget history, we should learn from it and grow into a more successful society with equal opportunities for everyone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *